turned out to be much better than I had anticipated. It was supposedly
produced in an attempt to avoid the serious, artistic films such as
Maboroshi or AfterLife, and create something that resembles the US
blockbuster, action flick, so popular in Japan. It's not great by any
means, but my expectations were so low that it turned out to be quite
entertaining. The movie is influenced by films that should be familiar
to most of us. *Warning! Warning! Possible spoilers dectected* It is the future and the world being destoyed by aliens in fast photon-shooting ships (reminiscent of Independence Day).
For good measure, some ships are disguised as regular planes to
infiltrate humans holed up in Tibet, then transform into shrimp-bent
baddies (remember The Transformers?). They decide that the
only way to save themselves is to travel to the past and prevent the
war from happening in the first place (Terminator). The time
machine is incomplete but someone has to go, and a ragamuffin young
girl is the last chance as the aliens enter the cave where humanity
makes its last stand. She travels into the past and falls right in the
middle of a fight between a Miyamoto (Kaneshiro) who is seeking revenge
on a Chinese/Japanese mobster-connection thug named Mizoguchi
(Kishitani). Miyamoto kicks but in regular and slow motion, and
Mizoguchi escapes. In the process, however, Miyamoto accidentally
shoots the girl, Milly, and they hook up. She tries to explain to him
that she's from the future, but he'll have none of it, so she proves it
with her slow-time-down-watch that makes her rund in super speed while
everything else seem to be stopped (Matrix). After Miyamoto
becomes a believer, they go to the reserach center where the first
alien is being kept, the alien suspecte of starting this whole war in
the future. But when they finally get to this small creature with huge
eyes, all he (it?) want to do is "go home" and tries to connect with
these kind humans (E.T.). Get the picture?
This
movie has gotten a load of bad press, and because of its derivative
nature, it is perhaps understandable. But there are two big things that
they do not understand. Yeah, right, the O-man's the only one who can see the light, hahaha, I'm so full of it.
The Japanese--first in classical poetry, then in others genres from
drama to narratives--make an art of "borrowing" from other sources.
This is not meant to plagerize but to celebrate the past and to expand
the meaning of present. In Returner, the connection is obvious to E.T.,
so while we have this warm and fuzzy image of ET in our mind, we are
watching another alien being kept away from its mothership, and
understand the wrath that could befall mankind if a Mizoguchi finds an
alien rather than Elliott. This makes for a more complex viewing of the
film, one that should make us think about different possibilities
rather than deride the copying. And indeed, copying from an obvious
source is crucial, as Fujiwara Teika once wrote. If the reference was
obscure, what effect would it have? In the West, this technique is
usually reserved for spoofs such as MAD Magazine or The Simpsons. But
in Japan, it is an artistic technique.
The other thing these
critics are missing is the comic book aspect. Many of them made
reference to anime, but this is definitely a comic book movie. Many of
the scenes are "frozen" as if they were a cell straight out of a manga
(J comic books). There is one scene in which Miyamoto is shot in the
street and the rain is falling down on him. The shot is taken from
above with streams of rain falling down at an angle for a 3D effect
toward the prone figure on the ground. And what is a movie but a 2D
photograph in motion. This is classic comic book technique to provide
depth perception--a technique begun by Tezuka Osamu in the 50s and
adopted by US comic book artists much later.
Anyway, I'm not
trying to sell the movie. It wasn't THAT good. But it can be better
appreciated than the critics would lead you to believe. If you have a
lazy weekend someday, it might be fun to watch.
Comments (16)
I thought the Returner was funny. But it wasn't supposed to be a comedy. Anyway, the guy was cute. I have no issues with that aspect.
I thought the Returner was funny. But it wasn't supposed to be a comedy. Anyway, the guy was cute. I have no issues with that aspect.
when i saw the movie last year, i thought it was the shiznit, then the aliens came out at the very end and i quickly threw my tv out the window yelling at the director for wasting 2 hours of my life...NOT A WAY TO END A COOL MOVIE MAN, NO WAY! ahhhhhh!!!
damnit 18 shy...i like that drawing, you do it?
woah whats this about you being scarred by the Catholic Church? Im Catholic so I hope that all your experiences werent bad in the church.
i'm off by 8. i'm 20K+8
ok WOAH. lookie! i'm number 20000!! so do i get a pressie or something?
you should write about your trip to italy in nlute ok? that was 36 years ago you said? and thanks, i'm glad i got back in one piece too and nothing bad really happened...just the cockroach taste in my mouth. ugh.
aww mang im 19988
Sounds like a good movie to me. As for plagiarizing, there has not been a new plot on the big screen in 20 years. Everything is somehow borrowed from some other stories. It does not bother me at all to watch movies with plots similar to other stories. I must add that I generally hate movies that deal with time though, it's such a complex issue. In the end though, I usually let go of my scientific opinions on time and simply enjoy the movie. After all, isn't that what movies are for? And I totally LOVE those awsome cinematic shots that show rain falling from above and shots like that. It's one of the reasons I love anime so much. They can project the director's imagination in such a way that is usually impossible or cost prohibitive in "live" movies.
I`m sorry to hear that the Catholic Church has "scarred" you for life. When I was living in the Philippines, I had the same kind of teachers--those who scare you into believing in God. But then when I moved to the States, I learned that the church is made up of people who are trying their best to spread the word of Christ and it`s okay if I don`t agree with everything they say/preach because it`s their own interpretation of things---trust me, there are things that I don`t agree with the church, such as abortion/homosexuality/divorce, etc...but I don`t think it makes me a bad Catholic. I believe in the core beliefe of the religion--that Jesus died in the cross for us, he rose from the dead, and he will come back for us someday---I`m still questioning my faith. I think that being a good Catholic means continuously questioning your faith and trying to understand how you fit in God`s "plan." It`s unfortunate that the Church has a repuation of scaring people into thinking that as a sinner you`re automatically condemmend for life. I think now, they are trying to present to people a forgiving and loving God, and emphasizing less on the whole sinner/hell theme.
it just occurred to me, you being a teacher and all. you might be wondering, "steffy, tell me why you like THE RETURNER?" hehehe. i don't get too technical but i just like it.
i rented THE RETURN last month. i thought it was pretty good.
magic number? bleh... i'll know when it happens, HAHA
i might just keep coming back and forth to your page 'til i reach the "magic" number. then again, i DO have a life =P
g-returner? havent seen it yet, but ill keep my expectations low
but since everything japanese gets me hard, i dunno.........
20k? make it me!!
Magic number? For the Cubs to clinch the division, you mean? But baseball hasn't even started yet!
Comments are closed.